Lomography LC-A Minitar-1 32mm f/2.8 Art Review
Lomography LC-A Minitar-1 32mm f/2.8 Art Verdict
If we want sharp, crisp images then this is absolutely not the lens to buy.
However, this is a lens of unique style that does not pander to a concept of sharpness, so it all hinges on whether or not we find our photography gels with the Lomography view of the visual world. If it does, then the Minitar Art Lens offers that freedom from technical considerations and the opportunity to just go out there and freely shoot what we see and feel about the world. If this is the case, then it is good value for money.
Lomography LC-A Minitar-1 32mm f/2.8 Art Pros
Well made
Compact
Encourages artistic freedom
Distinctive image style
High colour saturation
Lomography LC-A Minitar-1 32mm f/2.8 Art Cons
Poor sharpness
High distortion
High flare levels against the light
FEATURES | ![]() |
|
HANDLING | ![]() |
|
PERFORMANCE | ![]() |
|
VALUE FOR MONEY | ![]() |
|
VERDICT | ![]() |
The Lomography LC-A Minitar-1 32mm f/2.8 gives a unique image style in a well made and easy to handle optic.
Specifications
Add your message
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free.
photodo Stats
428 MTF tests
74 in-depth photodo reviews
100+ users join each day
Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search
Latest Lens Reviews
- Chinon 28mm f/2.8 Vintage Lens Review
- Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM Lens Review
- Samyang AF 85mm f/1.4 EF Review
- Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art Review
- Samyang AF 24mm f/2.8 FE Review
- Meike 50mm f/1.7 Review
- Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD Review
- Lensbaby Burnside 35mm f/2.8 Review
- Asahi Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 Review
- Asahi Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f/3.5 Review