Opinion re: Buying Macro lens for my Nikon
I am interested in purchasing a Macro lens for my Nikon F5 and my Digital Nikon. Any ideas what would be the best match for film and digital SLRs? I am interested in close up photography of flowers, insects, stamps etc.... I have looked at the Nikkor 105mm f2.8 VR but find it is beyond my budget. Any suggestion for a sharp reasonably priced macro lens?
Given that the Nikon will be the best choice, have you sonsidered looking for a second hand one? You could try watching eBay, even put in a standing search for the item you want so you don't miss it.
Alternatively, to cut the cost even more, how about a manual focus Nikon macro, probably available used at much lower prices. Much macro work is better done with manual focus anyway.
Do you need VR when most macro should be on a tripod?
Hope these ideas help.
John
Alternatively, to cut the cost even more, how about a manual focus Nikon macro, probably available used at much lower prices. Much macro work is better done with manual focus anyway.
Do you need VR when most macro should be on a tripod?
Hope these ideas help.
John
Thanks John for your input on my search for a macro lens. I will certainly look on ebay for a used manual macro.
On the thom hogan website, the Tamron 90 f2.8 Di is also recommended as an alternative to the Nikon macro. Any comments on this lens?
On the thom hogan website, the Tamron 90 f2.8 Di is also recommended as an alternative to the Nikon macro. Any comments on this lens?
It is a good lens, but quite heavy and bulky compared to some marque lenses. However, it would do the job very well. One friend of mine used such a lens professionally, but he had to buy a new one every couple of years as they didn't stand up to the very hard use he put them through.
John
John
I wouldn't agree that the Tamron 90mm is bulky, in fact it is quite lightly built, hence the short life in hard use.
The Tokina and Sigma 3rd party offerings are better built and all of the 100mm (roughly) lenses are good performers.
The VR on the Nikon is good for hand held portraits and the like, but the effectiveness reduces as you get closer to the subject.
Ian
The Tokina and Sigma 3rd party offerings are better built and all of the 100mm (roughly) lenses are good performers.
The VR on the Nikon is good for hand held portraits and the like, but the effectiveness reduces as you get closer to the subject.
Ian
There were several versions I think of the Tamoron - the one I had seemed bulky to me, but if you consider that I use Pentax lenses, which are very compact, maybe that explains it.
John
John
Add your message
Login required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free.
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free.
photodo Stats
1102 lenses
428 MTF tests
74 in-depth photodo reviews
100+ users join each day
Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search
428 MTF tests
74 in-depth photodo reviews
100+ users join each day
Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search
Latest Lens Reviews
- Chinon 28mm f/2.8 Vintage Lens Review
- Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM Lens Review
- Samyang AF 85mm f/1.4 EF Review
- Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art Review
- Samyang AF 24mm f/2.8 FE Review
- Meike 50mm f/1.7 Review
- Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD Review
- Lensbaby Burnside 35mm f/2.8 Review
- Asahi Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 Review
- Asahi Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f/3.5 Review