Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6 AF-S VR DX Nikkor
Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6 AF-S VR DX Nikkor Performance
For a budget telephoto, this lens performs very well. Shooting wide open at 55mm, the sharpness in the centre is already good, and the clarity towards the edges isn't far behind. Peak performance across the frame is achieved at f/8 for this focal length, where sharpness across the frame is excellent.
Zooming the lens to 105mm results in very good sharpness in the centre and fair performance towards the edges of the frame at the maximum aperture. Peak quality across the frame is achieved at f/8, just like at 55mm, where sharpness approaches excellent levels across the frame.
Finally, at 200mm, sharpness in the centre of the frame remains good at maximum aperture and the quality towards the edges is fair. As with other focal lengths, stopping the lens down improves sharpness, but peak quality across the frame is achieved at f/11, and sharpness is very good across the frame.
55mm | 105mm |
200mm | How to read our graphs |
The blue column represents readings from the centre of the picture frame at the various apertures and the green is from the edges. Averaging them out gives the red weighted column. The scale on the left side is an indication of actual image resolution. The taller the column, the better the lens performance. Simple. For this review, the lens was tested on a Nikon D300 using Imatest. |
Chromatic aberrations are kept to very low levels across the frame and at each zoom setting. At their worst, the just exceed 0.8 pixel widths at 200mm and f/5.6, which should pose few issues, even at large print sizes.
55mm | 105mm |
200mm | How to read our graphs |
Chromatic aberration is the lens' inability to focus on the sensor or film all colours of visible light at the same point. Severe chromatic aberration gives a noticeable fringing or a halo effect around sharp edges within the picture. It can be cured in software. Apochromatic lenses have special lens elements (aspheric, extra-low dispersion etc) to minimize the problem, hence they usually cost more. For this review, the lens was tested on a Nikon D300 using Imatest. |
Falloff of illumination towards the corners of the frame is well controlled. At 55mm and f/4 the corners are only 0.754 stops darker than the image centre and visually uniform illumination is achieved at f/5.6. At 200mm and f/5.6 the corners are only 0.807 stops darker than the image centre and visually uniform illumination is achieved at f/8.
Rather strangely for a zoom lens 1.07% pincushion distortion is present at the short end of the zoom range. Luckily this level doesn't increase too much as the lens is zoomed in with pincushion distortion levels only increasing to 1.17% at 200mm. The distortion pattern is uniform across the frame, so this should be relatively easy to correct in image editing software afterwards.
A deep circular hood comes supplied with the lens, which does an excellent job of shielding the lens from extraneous light that may cause flare or loss of contrast. When shooting into strong light sources, a noticeable loss of contrast is often apparent, especially at 200mm, so care may need to be taken when shooting under these circumstances.
Add your message
Login required
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free.
Please login here or if you've not registered, you can register here. Registering is safe, quick and free.
photodo Stats
1102 lenses
428 MTF tests
74 in-depth photodo reviews
100+ users join each day
Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search
428 MTF tests
74 in-depth photodo reviews
100+ users join each day
Help the lens community by reviewing or rating a lens today via our lens search
Latest Lens Reviews
- Chinon 28mm f/2.8 Vintage Lens Review
- Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM Lens Review
- Samyang AF 85mm f/1.4 EF Review
- Sigma 70mm f/2.8 DG Macro Art Review
- Samyang AF 24mm f/2.8 FE Review
- Meike 50mm f/1.7 Review
- Tamron 70-210mm f/4 Di VC USD Review
- Lensbaby Burnside 35mm f/2.8 Review
- Asahi Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 Review
- Asahi Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 135mm f/3.5 Review